insc-2026-77 — Raj Singh Gehlot vs Amitabha Sen

Practice Areas

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Constitution of India Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 General Clauses Act, 1897 Government of India to fulfil its responsibilities under the Environment Protection Act, 1986 Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983 Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Haryana Development and Regulations of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 In case of licenses issued under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Indian Penal Code, 1860 It had in fact already enacted a statute known as Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Learned Solicitor General relied upon the provisions of General Clauses Act, 1897 NGT Act NGT Act, 2010 NGT travel beyond the scope of proceedings contemplated under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Punjab General Clauses Act, 1956 Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restricted of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 Registrar under the Indian Registration Act, 1908 Registration Act, 1908 Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Specific Relief Act, 1963

Judges (2)

J.B. Pardiwala Coram Sandeep Mehta Delivered

Parties (2)

Amitabha Sen Respondent Raj Singh Gehlot Appellant

Summary

Civil appeals concerning real estate disputes including RERA compliance and related issues. The Supreme Court disposed of the connected appeals and special leave petitions on their merits with no order as to costs.

What was the outcome of Raj Singh Gehlot vs Amitabha Sen?

Civil appeals concerning real estate disputes including RERA compliance and related issues. The Supreme Court disposed of the connected appeals and special leave petitions on their merits with no orde...