insc-2026-63 — The State Of Haryana vs Krishan Kumar

Practice Areas

Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949 An intractable question has arisen in the present writ petition in view of provisions of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Civil Services Act, 1978 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Constitution of India Drugs and Control Act, 1940 Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Drugs and Cosmetics State of Haryana in Act, 1940 Drugs and of the Karnataka State Cosmetics Act, 1940 Fire Force Act, 1964 Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 GOI Act Government of India Act, 1935 Indian Independence Act, 1947 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Mother Vehicle Act, 1988 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Part I of List III (Concurrent Legislative List) of the Government of India Act, 1935 Provincial Act or any Ordinance or Regulation made by the Governor of a Province under the Government of India Act, 1985 said judgment dealt with the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988

Judges (2)

J.K. Maheshwari Delivered Vijay Bishnoi Coram

Parties (2)

State of Haryana Appellant Krishan Kumar Respondent

Summary

Batch of civil appeals concerning the power of the State Government to prescribe essential qualifications for public service recruitment in Haryana. The Supreme Court adjudicated the challenges to recruitment rules and allowed the appeals.

What was the outcome of The State Of Haryana vs Krishan Kumar?

Batch of civil appeals concerning the power of the State Government to prescribe essential qualifications for public service recruitment in Haryana. The Supreme Court adjudicated the challenges to rec...