Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation
Practice Areas
Judges (2)
Counsel (1)
Case Significance
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation is a Supreme Court of India decision dated January 15, 2026 (citation: insc-2026-115). The Court considered whether notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, 2023 are mandatory in all cases for offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years. The Supreme Court held that arrest is not mandatory but discretionary, and a notice under Section 35(3) to an accused for offences up to 7 years imprisonment is the rule, with arrest being the exception. The bench comprised Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh. The judgment was delivered by Justice M.M. Sundresh. Counsel appearing: Sidharth Luthra (amicus curiae).
This case has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment. The judgment references 7 case citations.
Summary
The Court considered whether notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, 2023 are mandatory in all cases for offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years. The Supreme Court held that arrest is not mandatory but discretionary, and a notice under Section 35(3) to an accused for offences up to 7 years imprisonment is the rule, with arrest being the exception.
What was the outcome of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation?
The Court considered whether notices under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, 2023 are mandatory in all cases for offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years. The Supreme Court held that arrest is not...
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (7)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (insc-2026-115)