Virendra Kumar Chamar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
Virendra Kumar Chamar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh is a Supreme Court of India decision dated August 7, 2024 (citation: insc-2024-606). The appellant (accused no. 3) was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder involving a knife attack alongside two co-accused armed with pistols. The Supreme Court found that the prosecution case was unreliable — the firearm injuries caused death but the knife merely caused a superficial wound, and the eyewitness evidence was not credible. The appellant was acquitted and ordered to be set at liberty. The bench comprised Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih. The judgment was delivered by Justice Abhay S. Oka. Counsel appearing: Adarsh Upadhyay (counsel for respondent), Manju Jetley (counsel for appellant), Rajesh Kumar Singh (counsel for respondent), Shailendra Kumar Singh (counsel for appellant), Vishal Vishwadheesh (counsel for appellant).
Summary
The appellant (accused no. 3) was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder involving a knife attack alongside two co-accused armed with pistols. The Supreme Court found that the prosecution case was unreliable — the firearm injuries caused death but the knife merely caused a superficial wound, and the eyewitness evidence was not credible. The appellant was acquitted and ordered to be set at liberty.
What was the outcome of Virendra Kumar Chamar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh?
The appellant (accused no. 3) was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder involving a knife attack alongside two co-accused armed with pistols. The Supreme Court found that the prosecution case was...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (insc-2024-606)