Ram Murti Sharma vs State Of U.P.
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Ram Murti Sharma vs State Of U.P. is a Supreme Court of India decision dated March 22, 2024 (citation: insc-2024-250). The complainant father challenged the High Court's bail order for a murder accused who was not named in the FIR but was implicated during investigation. The Supreme Court set aside the bail order, finding the High Court failed to give proper reasons and merely noted arguments without discussing relevant evidence, which the Sessions Judge had detailed while rejecting bail. The accused was granted three weeks to surrender. The bench comprised Justices Rajesh Bindal and Sudhanshu Dhulia. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal.
Summary
The complainant father challenged the High Court's bail order for a murder accused who was not named in the FIR but was implicated during investigation. The Supreme Court set aside the bail order, finding the High Court failed to give proper reasons and merely noted arguments without discussing relevant evidence, which the Sessions Judge had detailed while rejecting bail. The accused was granted three weeks to surrender.
What was the outcome of Ram Murti Sharma vs State Of U.P.?
The complainant father challenged the High Court's bail order for a murder accused who was not named in the FIR but was implicated during investigation. The Supreme Court set aside the bail order, fin...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (insc-2024-250)