Thakore Umedsing Nathusing vs State Of Gujarat
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Thakore Umedsing Nathusing vs State Of Gujarat is a Supreme Court of India decision dated February 22, 2024 (citation: insc-2024-198). Four accused were convicted for robbery under Section 392 IPC but acquitted of murder charges by the trial court; the High Court later reversed the acquittal and convicted them for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence from a 1990 incident near Banaskantha. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and acquitted all accused, finding the High Court's judgment was based on conjectures and surmises rather than reliable circumstantial evidence, and the man The bench comprised Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sandeep Mehta.
Summary
Four accused were convicted for robbery under Section 392 IPC but acquitted of murder charges by the trial court; the High Court later reversed the acquittal and convicted them for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence from a 1990 incident near Banaskantha. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and acquitted all accused, finding the High Court's judgment was based on conjectures and surmises rather than reliable circumstantial evidence, and the mandatory requirements for reversing a trial court acquittal were not satisfied.
What was the outcome of Thakore Umedsing Nathusing vs State Of Gujarat?
Four accused were convicted for robbery under Section 392 IPC but acquitted of murder charges by the trial court; the High Court later reversed the acquittal and convicted them for murder under Sectio...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (insc-2024-198)