Anil Mishra vs State Of U.P.
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Anil Mishra vs State Of U.P. is a Supreme Court of India decision dated March 1, 2024 (citation: insc-2024-189). The appellant, an injured victim and original FIR complainant in a 1999 kidnapping case, challenged the High Court's order quashing the FIR based on a settlement agreement between the accused and the abducted person (respondent no. 5), to which the appellant was not a party. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the criminal proceedings, holding that the High Court erred in quashing the FIR based on a settlement to which the injured complainant had not consented, applying the prin The bench comprised Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and Vikram Nath. The judgment was delivered by Justice Vikram Nath.
Summary
The appellant, an injured victim and original FIR complainant in a 1999 kidnapping case, challenged the High Court's order quashing the FIR based on a settlement agreement between the accused and the abducted person (respondent no. 5), to which the appellant was not a party. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the criminal proceedings, holding that the High Court erred in quashing the FIR based on a settlement to which the injured complainant had not consented, applying the principles in Gian Singh.
What was the outcome of Anil Mishra vs State Of U.P.?
The appellant, an injured victim and original FIR complainant in a 1999 kidnapping case, challenged the High Court's order quashing the FIR based on a settlement agreement between the accused and the ...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (insc-2024-189)