Rachna Mehnidratta vs Girdhari Lal

ik-84308597 Delhi High Court 21 November 2025 • 9 min read

Judges (1)

Chandrasekharan Sudha Delivered

Counsel (5)

Avinash Kapoor Counsel Appellant Dinesh Garg Counsel Respondent Dipayan Gupta Counsel Appellant Harshit Vashisht Counsel Appellant Shivdeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

Girdhari Lal Respondent Rachna Mehnidratta Appellant

Case Significance

Rachna Mehnidratta vs Girdhari Lal is a Delhi High Court decision dated November 21, 2025 (citation: ik-84308597). The appellant challenged an interim injunction order restraining defendants from creating third-party interests or making structural changes to the suit property at 38/1, Ground Floor, Double Storey, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi during the pendency of a suit. The dispute involved competing claims to property that originally devolved from the original allottee, with the respondent/plaintiff asserting rights through inheritance. The appeal was dismissed, the court finding no perversity or jurisdicti The case was heard by Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha. Counsel appearing: Avinash Kapoor (counsel for appellant), Dinesh Garg (counsel for respondent), Dipayan Gupta (counsel for appellant), Harshit Vashisht (counsel for appellant), Shivdeep Kumar Tripathi (counsel for appellant).

Summary

The appellant challenged an interim injunction order restraining defendants from creating third-party interests or making structural changes to the suit property at 38/1, Ground Floor, Double Storey, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi during the pendency of a suit. The dispute involved competing claims to property that originally devolved from the original allottee, with the respondent/plaintiff asserting rights through inheritance. The appeal was dismissed, the court finding no perversity or jurisdictional error in the trial court's order, which was protective in nature and consistent with Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act on lis pendens.

What was the outcome of Rachna Mehnidratta vs Girdhari Lal?

The appellant challenged an interim injunction order restraining defendants from creating third-party interests or making structural changes to the suit property at 38/1, Ground Floor, Double Storey, ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-84308597)