Rehaan S/O. Akram Baig vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ...

ik-82164995 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

G.A. Sanap Delivered

Counsel (1)

Atharva Manohar Counsel Appellant

Parties (7)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Ashwind Singh Shatrughnasingh Chavan Appellant Mohd. Shamim Abdul Ajij Appellant Pankaj Vinayak Kanoje Appellant Ravindra Sampatrao Madekar Appellant Rehaan Akram Baig Appellant Sallukumar Balsubramanyam Kaunder Appellant

Case Significance

Rehaan S/O. Akram Baig vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-82164995). Fifteen connected criminal appeals arising from a robbery/dacoity case in Karanja (Ghadge), Wardha district, involving over 20 accused convicted under Sections 397, 412, 120-B, and 342 of IPC. The Nagpur Bench partially allowed the appeals, acquitting multiple accused of S.412 IPC (receiving stolen property) and some of S.397/120-B/342, finding insufficient evidence for those specific charges. Bail bonds of acquitted accused were cancelled. The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Atharva Manohar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Fifteen connected criminal appeals arising from a robbery/dacoity case in Karanja (Ghadge), Wardha district, involving over 20 accused convicted under Sections 397, 412, 120-B, and 342 of IPC. The Nagpur Bench partially allowed the appeals, acquitting multiple accused of S.412 IPC (receiving stolen property) and some of S.397/120-B/342, finding insufficient evidence for those specific charges. Bail bonds of acquitted accused were cancelled.

What was the outcome of Rehaan S/O. Akram Baig vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-82164995)