Yahiya Abdulla Makrani And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ik-75078443 Bombay High Court 25 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 1548 OF 2024 • 13 min read

Judges (1)

Y.G. Khobragade Delivered

Counsel (3)

A. N. Ansari Counsel Respondent C. V. Bhadane Counsel Respondent N.L. Jadhav Counsel Petitioner

Parties (8)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Khaled Abdulla Makrani Petitioner Mahemuda Hasan Kardus Respondent Numan Abdulla Makrani Petitioner Talha Abdulla Makrani Petitioner Yahiya Abdulla Makrani Petitioner Zubeda Idris Bashan Petitioner Zuber Abdulla Makrani Petitioner

Case Significance

Yahiya Abdulla Makrani And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 25, 2024 (citation: ik-75078443). Six petitioners challenged criminal process issued under Sections 468 and 471 read with Section 34 IPC for allegedly forging signatures on a land mutation application at Patoda, Beed district. The petitioners argued a civil suit for partition already covered the same cause. The Court found the criminal complaint specifically alleged forgery of signatures which required full trial, the civil suit prayer for partition was different, and both the Magistrate and Sessions Court orders were not per The case was heard by Justice Y.G. Khobragade. Counsel appearing: A. N. Ansari (counsel for respondent), C. V. Bhadane (counsel for respondent), N.L. Jadhav (counsel for petitioner).

Summary

Six petitioners challenged criminal process issued under Sections 468 and 471 read with Section 34 IPC for allegedly forging signatures on a land mutation application at Patoda, Beed district. The petitioners argued a civil suit for partition already covered the same cause. The Court found the criminal complaint specifically alleged forgery of signatures which required full trial, the civil suit prayer for partition was different, and both the Magistrate and Sessions Court orders were not perverse. The writ petition was dismissed.

What was the outcome of Yahiya Abdulla Makrani And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another?

Six petitioners challenged criminal process issued under Sections 468 and 471 read with Section 34 IPC for allegedly forging signatures on a land mutation application at Patoda, Beed district. The pet...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-75078443)