Pankaj S/O. Vinayak Kanoje(In Jail) vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., ...

ik-65425081 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

G.A. Sanap Delivered

Counsel (9)

A. M. Joshi Counsel Respondent A.S. Mardikar Counsel Appellant Atharva Manohar Counsel Appellant Bhavin Suchak Counsel Appellant D.P. Singh Counsel Appellant K. H. Anandani Counsel Appellant M. B. Sharma Counsel Appellant V. D. Ruparelia Counsel Appellant Ved Deshpande Counsel Appellant

Parties (5)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Ashwind Singh Shatrughnasingh Chavan Appellant Pankaj Vinayak Kanoje Appellant Ravindra Sampatrao Madekar Appellant Sallukumar Balsubramanyam Kaunder Appellant

Case Significance

Pankaj S/O. Vinayak Kanoje(In Jail) vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-65425081). Fourteen connected criminal appeals arising from a robbery case in Wardha district, Nagpur bench. Multiple accused challenged their convictions under Sections 397, 120-B, 342, and 412 of the IPC. The court partially allowed the appeals, acquitting several accused of the Section 412 (dishonestly receiving stolen property) charge while disposing of all pending applications. The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap.

Summary

Fourteen connected criminal appeals arising from a robbery case in Wardha district, Nagpur bench. Multiple accused challenged their convictions under Sections 397, 120-B, 342, and 412 of the IPC. The court partially allowed the appeals, acquitting several accused of the Section 412 (dishonestly receiving stolen property) charge while disposing of all pending applications.

What was the outcome of Pankaj S/O. Vinayak Kanoje(In Jail) vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-65425081)