S.Rajaseekaran vs Union Of India And Ors

ik-62880693 Supreme Court of India 7 October 2025 • Writ Petition(Civil) No.295 • 4 min read

Judges (2)

Counsel (86)

Arputham Aruna And Co Firm Aakash Thakur Counsel Respondent Aishwarya Bhati Counsel Respondent Akshay Tiwari Counsel Respondent Aman Gautam Counsel Respondent Amit Anand Tiwari Counsel Respondent Amit Kumar Singh Counsel Respondent Anando Mukherjee Counsel Respondent Annirudh Sharma II Counsel Respondent Aravindh S Counsel Respondent Arputham Aruna And Co Counsel Respondent Azmat Hayat Amanullah Counsel Respondent B.K. Satija Counsel Respondent Beenu Sharma Counsel Respondent Chandan Kumar Singh Counsel Respondent Chubalemla Chang Counsel Respondent D.K. Devesh Counsel Respondent Danish Saifi Counsel Respondent Debojit Borkakati Counsel Respondent Deepanwita Priyanka Counsel Respondent Deepayan Dutta Counsel Respondent Devina Sehgal Counsel Respondent Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava Counsel Respondent E.C. Agrawala Counsel Respondent Ekta Kundu Counsel Respondent Gaurav Agrawal Counsel Amicus Ishaan Sharma Counsel Respondent Jagdish Chandra Solanki Counsel Respondent Jahnavi Taneja Counsel Respondent Jaikriti S. Jadeja Counsel Respondent Juhi Bhargava Counsel Respondent K. Enatoli Sema Counsel Respondent Karun Sharma Counsel Respondent Kishan Chand Jain Counsel Respondent Krishna Kumar Counsel Petitioner Kunal Mimani Counsel Respondent Manan Daga Counsel Amicus Mukesh Kumar Maroria Counsel Respondent Neeraj Shekhar Counsel Respondent Nitya Sharma Counsel Respondent Parag Chaturvedi Counsel Respondent Pooja Singh Counsel Respondent Prang Newmai Counsel Respondent Prashant Bhagwati Counsel Respondent Prerna Mehta Counsel Respondent Priyal Sheth Counsel Respondent Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar Counsel Respondent Raghvendra Kumar Counsel Respondent Rahul Kumar Counsel Respondent Raj Bahadur Yadav Counsel Respondent Rajan Narain Counsel Respondent Rashmi Nandakumar Counsel Respondent Ravi Raghunath Counsel Amicus Rebecca Mishra Counsel Respondent Ruchira Goel Counsel Respondent Ruchira Gupta Counsel Respondent Sabarish Subramanian Counsel Respondent Sameer Abhyankar Counsel Respondent Satyalipsu Ray Counsel Respondent Saurabh Tripathi Counsel Respondent Sharath Nambiar Counsel Respondent Shirin Khajuria Counsel Respondent Shivang Goel Counsel Respondent Shivang Thapiliyal Counsel Petitioner Shuvodeep Roy Counsel Respondent Shwetank Singh Counsel Respondent Srikanth Varma Mudunuru Counsel Respondent Subhasish Mohanty Counsel Respondent Sudarshan Lamba Counsel Respondent Sumit Gupta Counsel Respondent Sunita Sharma Counsel Respondent Suraj Kundu Counsel Respondent Swarupama Chaturvedi Counsel Respondent Swati Tiwari Counsel Respondent T.S. Sabarish Counsel Respondent Tanya Shrotriya Counsel Respondent Tulika Mukherjee Counsel Respondent Venkat Narayan Counsel Respondent Vikramjit Banerjee Counsel Respondent Vinodh Kanna B Counsel Petitioner Viresh B. Saharya Counsel Respondent Vishnu Unnikrishnan Counsel Respondent Vivek Kishore Counsel Respondent Yanmi Phazang Counsel Respondent Yashmita Pandey Counsel Respondent Yatharth Kansal Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Case Significance

S.Rajaseekaran vs Union Of India And Ors is a Supreme Court of India decision dated October 7, 2025 (citation: ik-62880693). Long-running public interest litigation involving multiple state respondents. The Supreme Court passed various directions for compliance and listed the matter for review after seven months, with directions to list certain interlocutory applications on a specific date. The bench comprised Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan. The judgment was delivered by Justice J.B. Pardiwala.

Summary

Long-running public interest litigation involving multiple state respondents. The Supreme Court passed various directions for compliance and listed the matter for review after seven months, with directions to list certain interlocutory applications on a specific date.

What was the outcome of S.Rajaseekaran vs Union Of India And Ors?

Long-running public interest litigation involving multiple state respondents. The Supreme Court passed various directions for compliance and listed the matter for review after seven months, with direc...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-62880693)