Sap India Private Limited vs Cox And Kings Limited

ik-60928436 Bombay High Court 23 December 2025 • WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 39997 OF 2025 • 9 min read

Judges (2)

Farhan P. Dubash Delivered R.I. Chagla Coram

Counsel (12)

Advani Law LLP Firm J. Sagar Associates Firm Esham Karanjikar Counsel Respondent Farhad Sorabjee Counsel Petitioner Hiroo Advani Counsel Respondent Janhavi Sakalkar Counsel Respondent Navdeep Dahiya Counsel Respondent Navroz H. Seervai Counsel Petitioner Pratik Pawar Counsel Petitioner Shanaya Cyrus Irani Counsel Petitioner Siddhesh S. Pradhan Counsel Petitioner Yohaann Limathwalla Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

Cox and Kings Limited Respondent SAP India Private Limited Petitioner

Case Significance

Sap India Private Limited vs Cox And Kings Limited is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 23, 2025 (citation: ik-60928436). SAP India challenged orders of the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting its applications under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act contesting jurisdiction. The Division Bench found no patent lack of inherent jurisdiction or perversity in the Tribunal's orders, and held that writ court interference was not warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioners' remedy being under Section 34 after the final award. The bench comprised Justices Farhan P. Dubash and R.I. Chagla. The judgment was delivered by Justice Farhan P. Dubash.

Summary

SAP India challenged orders of the Arbitral Tribunal rejecting its applications under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act contesting jurisdiction. The Division Bench found no patent lack of inherent jurisdiction or perversity in the Tribunal's orders, and held that writ court interference was not warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, with the petitioners' remedy being under Section 34 after the final award.

What was the outcome of Sap India Private Limited vs Cox And Kings Limited?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-60928436)