Arun Naidu@ Anna(In Jc)Presently At ... vs The State(Nct Of Delhi)

ik-58743233 Delhi High Court 8 December 2025 • 16 min read

Judges (1)

Manoj Kumar Ohri Delivered

Counsel (3)

A. K. Tiwari Counsel Appellant Arjun Malik Counsel Appellant Digam Singh Dagar Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

State (NCT) of Delhi Respondent Arun Naidu @ Anna Appellant Lalit Singh @ Sanjay @ Nepali Appellant

Case Significance

Arun Naidu@ Anna(In Jc)Presently At ... vs The State(Nct Of Delhi) is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 8, 2025 (citation: ik-58743233). Two connected appeals challenged the conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 392/397/34 IPC (robbery with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt) and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The key issues were identification of the appellants and the reliability of recoveries, where both victims admitted that the police had shown them the accused at a police station before their court identification and one victim acknowledged being coached to identify the recovered knife. The court set asid The case was heard by Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri. Counsel appearing: A. K. Tiwari (counsel for appellant), Arjun Malik (counsel for appellant), Digam Singh Dagar (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Two connected appeals challenged the conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 392/397/34 IPC (robbery with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt) and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The key issues were identification of the appellants and the reliability of recoveries, where both victims admitted that the police had shown them the accused at a police station before their court identification and one victim acknowledged being coached to identify the recovered knife. The court set aside the conviction, holding that the prosecution failed to establish the identity and involvement of the appellants beyond reasonable doubt due to tainted identification procedures and doubtful recoveries.

What was the outcome of Arun Naidu@ Anna(In Jc)Presently At ... vs The State(Nct Of Delhi)?

Two connected appeals challenged the conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 392/397/34 IPC (robbery with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt) and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The key i...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-58743233)