Vaijnath Sitaram Phad vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ik-5816194 Bombay High Court 25 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 1262 OF 2022 • 13 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Vaijnath Sitaram Phad vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 25, 2024 (citation: ik-5816194). The petitioner, a retired government employee and former parliamentary election candidate from Parbhani, challenged the refusal to renew his arms licence for a 32 Bore Revolver originally granted in 1997. The licence expired on 31.12.2019, but the petitioner applied for renewal only after a two-year lapse without sufficient explanation, and had also failed to complete registration with the Mumbai Police Commissioner despite residing in Mumbai. The Court upheld both the District Magistrate's a The case was heard by Justice Y.G. Khobragade. Counsel appearing: Mahadeo V. Nagargoje (counsel for petitioner), N. D. Batule (counsel for respondent).

Summary

The petitioner, a retired government employee and former parliamentary election candidate from Parbhani, challenged the refusal to renew his arms licence for a 32 Bore Revolver originally granted in 1997. The licence expired on 31.12.2019, but the petitioner applied for renewal only after a two-year lapse without sufficient explanation, and had also failed to complete registration with the Mumbai Police Commissioner despite residing in Mumbai. The Court upheld both the District Magistrate's and Divisional Commissioner's orders refusing renewal, finding them neither perverse nor illegal.

What was the outcome of Vaijnath Sitaram Phad vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another?

The petitioner, a retired government employee and former parliamentary election candidate from Parbhani, challenged the refusal to renew his arms licence for a 32 Bore Revolver originally granted in 1...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-5816194)