Amar Wamanrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others

ik-45678910 Bombay High Court 25 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 1801 OF 2024 • 19 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (5)

Case Significance

Amar Wamanrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 25, 2024 (citation: ik-45678910). The complainant in a medical negligence case sought to challenge an order by the Sessions Judge in criminal revision dismissing his petition regarding witness summons. The Court dismissed the writ petition, finding that since both seizure panchanamas had been admitted by the accused under Section 294 CrPC and already exhibited, examination of additional witnesses to the panchanamas was unnecessary as admitted facts need not be proved under Section 58 of the Evidence Act. The case was heard by Justice Y.G. Khobragade. Counsel appearing: R.B. Deshmukh (counsel for respondent), R.M. Deshmukh (counsel for petitioner), R.R. Deshmukh (counsel for respondent), V. M. Jaware (counsel for respondent).

Summary

The complainant in a medical negligence case sought to challenge an order by the Sessions Judge in criminal revision dismissing his petition regarding witness summons. The Court dismissed the writ petition, finding that since both seizure panchanamas had been admitted by the accused under Section 294 CrPC and already exhibited, examination of additional witnesses to the panchanamas was unnecessary as admitted facts need not be proved under Section 58 of the Evidence Act.

What was the outcome of Amar Wamanrao Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others?

The complainant in a medical negligence case sought to challenge an order by the Sessions Judge in criminal revision dismissing his petition regarding witness summons. The Court dismissed the writ pet...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-45678910)