Meheboob Husain Mulje vs The State Of Maharashtra
Judges (2)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Meheboob Husain Mulje vs The State Of Maharashtra is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 17, 2024 (citation: ik-45190287). The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife by cutting her throat with a knife at their residence in Tungi, Taluka Ausa, District Latur. The Court upheld the conviction, finding the circumstantial evidence — homicidal death at the couple's residence, the appellant's subsequent absconding, and his implausible explanation — consistent with his guilt, despite discarding the knife recovery for want of forensic evidence linking it to the crime. The legal ai The bench comprised Justices Neeraj P. Dhote and R.G. Avachat. The judgment was delivered by Justice Neeraj P. Dhote. Counsel appearing: G.N. Chincholkar (counsel for appellant), N.J. Patil (counsel for respondent), Uma S. Bhosale (counsel for respondent).
Summary
The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife by cutting her throat with a knife at their residence in Tungi, Taluka Ausa, District Latur. The Court upheld the conviction, finding the circumstantial evidence — homicidal death at the couple's residence, the appellant's subsequent absconding, and his implausible explanation — consistent with his guilt, despite discarding the knife recovery for want of forensic evidence linking it to the crime. The legal aid counsel's fees were quantified at Rs.10,000.
What was the outcome of Meheboob Husain Mulje vs The State Of Maharashtra?
The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 302 IPC for murdering his wife by cutting her throat with a knife at their residence in Tungi, Taluka Ausa, District Latur. The Court upheld the c...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-45190287)