Sunder Menghraj Chainani vs State (Nct Of Delhi)

ik-43089323 Delhi High Court 24 February 2026 • 15 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (11)

Abhimanyu Bhandari Counsel Respondent Abhinav Aggarwal Counsel Respondent Bharat Singh Counsel Respondent Manish Khan Counsel Respondent Nalin Kohli Counsel Respondent Nirvirkar Singh Counsel Respondent Pravir Singh Counsel Petitioner Tarang Srivastava Counsel Respondent Umesh Rautela Counsel Petitioner Vikas Pahwa Counsel Respondent Vishal Gosain Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

State (NCT) of Delhi Respondent Sunder Menghraj Chainani Petitioner

Case Significance

Sunder Menghraj Chainani vs State (Nct Of Delhi) is a Delhi High Court decision dated February 24, 2026 (citation: ik-43089323). The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case involving luxury watches worth crores, where he represented himself as a director and shareholder of Swiss Promotion Pvt. Ltd. and Rivoli Watch Pvt. Ltd. to obtain expensive watches which were never returned. Considering the gravity of allegations, contradictory statements regarding possession of watches, prima facie case against the petitioner, and high-value unrecovered case property, the Court dismissed the anticipatory bail applicati The case was heard by Justice Vikas Mahajan.

Summary

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case involving luxury watches worth crores, where he represented himself as a director and shareholder of Swiss Promotion Pvt. Ltd. and Rivoli Watch Pvt. Ltd. to obtain expensive watches which were never returned. Considering the gravity of allegations, contradictory statements regarding possession of watches, prima facie case against the petitioner, and high-value unrecovered case property, the Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application and withdrew interim protection.

What was the outcome of Sunder Menghraj Chainani vs State (Nct Of Delhi)?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-43089323)