Sau. Nandatai Vasantrao Deoghare, R/O ... vs Vitthal Fakirji Mankar, R/O Sati Chowk, ...

ik-42720953 Bombay High Court 7 March 2026 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 261 • 7 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (1)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Sau. Nandatai Vasantrao Deoghare, R/O ... vs Vitthal Fakirji Mankar, R/O Sati... is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 7, 2026 (citation: ik-42720953). The complainant appealed an acquittal in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s. Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) that NI Act complainants qualify as 'victims' under Section 2(wa) CrPC and can appeal under the proviso to Section 372, the Court transferred the matter to the District and Sessions Court for hearing as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372. The case was heard by Justice M.M. Nerlikar. Counsel appearing: R.D. Raskar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

The complainant appealed an acquittal in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s. Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) that NI Act complainants qualify as 'victims' under Section 2(wa) CrPC and can appeal under the proviso to Section 372, the Court transferred the matter to the District and Sessions Court for hearing as an appeal under the proviso to Section 372.

What was the outcome of Sau. Nandatai Vasantrao Deoghare, R/O ... vs Vitthal Fakirji Mankar, R/O Sati...?

The complainant appealed an acquittal in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s. Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekara...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-42720953)