Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ...

ik-35854327 Bombay High Court 24 December 2025 • WRIT PETITION NO. 11058 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11059 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11198 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 11753 OF 2025; Writ Petition No.11198 of 2025; Writ Petition No.11059 of 2025; Writ Petition No.11753 of 2025 • 18 min read

Judges (2)

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya Delivered Gautam A. Ankhad Coram

Counsel (14)

Desai Legal LLP Firm Abhijeet Desai Counsel Petitioner Ashutosh M. Kulkarni Counsel Respondent Daksha Punghera Counsel Petitioner Karan Gajra Counsel Petitioner M. P. Thakur Counsel Respondent Meghana Chavan Counsel Respondent Milind Sathe Counsel Respondent Mohini A. Rehpade Counsel Petitioner O.A. Chandurkar Counsel Respondent Pooja Patil Counsel Respondent Rahul Ner Counsel Respondent Sarthak Diwan Counsel Respondent Vijay Singh Counsel Petitioner

Parties (6)

Maharashtra Public Service Commission Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Amit Arun Londhe Petitioner Kartiki Awantika Petitioner Patil Naresh Dongar Petitioner Shruti Hemant Wade Petitioner

Case Significance

Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 24, 2025 (citation: ik-35854327). Four connected writ petitions filed by candidates challenging answer keys and evaluation of a Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) competitive examination. The key issue was whether the writ court could interfere with the examining body's evaluation when candidates claim correct answers were wrongly marked. The court, applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee, permitted petitioners to peruse their answer books only to verify if correct answers received no marks o The bench comprised Justices Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Gautam A. Ankhad. The judgment was delivered by Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya.

Summary

Four connected writ petitions filed by candidates challenging answer keys and evaluation of a Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) competitive examination. The key issue was whether the writ court could interfere with the examining body's evaluation when candidates claim correct answers were wrongly marked. The court, applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee, permitted petitioners to peruse their answer books only to verify if correct answers received no marks or were treated as wrong answers, with any doubts resolved in favour of the examining body.

What was the outcome of Green Gene Enviro Protection And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its...?

Four connected writ petitions filed by candidates challenging answer keys and evaluation of a Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) competitive examination. The key issue was whether the writ c...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-35854327)