Krishnanand Premrao Sirsewad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-2868328 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (3)

Gurudev Shikshan Sanstha Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Krishnanand Premrao Sirsewad Petitioner

Case Significance

Krishnanand Premrao Sirsewad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-2868328). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (contract teachers) challenged the validity of Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees for teacher grievances, arguing it unconstitutionally created a quasi-judicial forum by executive order. The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed all petitions, holding that the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal but was within the State's legislative competence, and directed petitioners to approach t The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (contract teachers) challenged the validity of Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees for teacher grievances, arguing it unconstitutionally created a quasi-judicial forum by executive order. The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed all petitions, holding that the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal but was within the State's legislative competence, and directed petitioners to approach the appellate committee within four weeks.

What was the outcome of Krishnanand Premrao Sirsewad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (contract teachers) challenged the validity of Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees for teacher grievances, arguing i...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-2868328)