Shrikrushna Pandurang Zope vs M/S Aplab Ltd

ik-27391999 Bombay High Court 7 March 2026 • WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2888 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2879 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2878 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2889 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2881 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2887 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2884 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2885 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4113 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4947 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4114 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4925 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4944 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5062 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4116 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4941 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4926 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5072 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5052 OF 2025 • 25 min read

Judges (1)

Parties (8)

Case Significance

Shrikrushna Pandurang Zope vs M/S Aplab Ltd is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 7, 2026 (citation: ik-27391999). Twenty connected writ petitions by retired employees of Aplab Ltd. challenged the company's gratuity computation, specifically whether 26 days (as for officers) or 15 days should be used, and whether special allowance constitutes dearness allowance under Section 2(s) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. The Court affirmed the Controlling and Appellate Authorities' orders but remitted the matter for fresh consideration on whether photocopied salary records establish the 26-day entitlement and wheth The case was heard by Justice Amit Borkar.

Summary

Twenty connected writ petitions by retired employees of Aplab Ltd. challenged the company's gratuity computation, specifically whether 26 days (as for officers) or 15 days should be used, and whether special allowance constitutes dearness allowance under Section 2(s) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. The Court affirmed the Controlling and Appellate Authorities' orders but remitted the matter for fresh consideration on whether photocopied salary records establish the 26-day entitlement and whether special allowance is substantively dearness allowance, with direction to adjust amounts already deposited.

What was the outcome of Shrikrushna Pandurang Zope vs M/S Aplab Ltd?

Twenty connected writ petitions by retired employees of Aplab Ltd. challenged the company's gratuity computation, specifically whether 26 days (as for officers) or 15 days should be used, and whether ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-27391999)