M.B.K. Enterprises And Ors vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors

ik-25925204 Bombay High Court 12 November 2024 • 86 min read

Judges (1)

Sandeep V. Marne Delivered

Counsel (13)

Ankur Shah Counsel Respondent Anosh Sequiera Counsel Respondent Bupesh Dhumatkar Counsel Applicant Chetan Kapadia Counsel Applicant Farzana Rine Counsel Applicant G.S. Godbole Counsel Applicant Gautam Ankhad Counsel Respondent Hufeza Nasikwal Counsel Applicant Kush Shah Counsel Respondent Madhura Kathe Counsel Applicant Snehal Raju Modi Counsel Applicant Vikrant Shetty Counsel Respondent Yuvraj Singh Counsel Applicant

Parties (9)

Dahlia Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Garden View Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Applicant M.B.K. Enterprises Applicant Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Marve Beach Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Mid-Day Publications Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. Respondent Shubh Mangal Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Vinod Mahabirprasad Gupta Respondent

Case Significance

M.B.K. Enterprises And Ors vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 12, 2024 (citation: ik-25925204). Two civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench in a rent dispute involving commercial tenancy and unauthorized additions/alterations to leased premises. The Court found the concurrent findings of fact regarding unauthorized additions were possible findings not warranting interference in revisionary jurisdiction, and the decrees were unexceptionable. Both revision applications were dismissed, with interim order co The case was heard by Justice Sandeep V. Marne.

Summary

Two civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench in a rent dispute involving commercial tenancy and unauthorized additions/alterations to leased premises. The Court found the concurrent findings of fact regarding unauthorized additions were possible findings not warranting interference in revisionary jurisdiction, and the decrees were unexceptionable. Both revision applications were dismissed, with interim order continued for four weeks.

What was the outcome of M.B.K. Enterprises And Ors vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors?

Two civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench in a rent dispute involving commercial tenancy and unauthorized addition...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-25925204)