Mah. State Handlooms Corporation Ltd. ... vs Dy. Regional Director, Employees State ...

ik-22744570 Bombay High Court 22 December 2025 • CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 935 OF 2021 • 10 min read

Judges (2)

Counsel (3)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Mah. State Handlooms Corporation Ltd. ... vs Dy. Regional Director, Employees... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 22, 2025 (citation: ik-22744570). The applicants sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act, arising from allegations by the complainant related to a political canvassing relationship during municipal elections in Washim. The Court found the case was manifestly attended with mala fide and the allegations did not disclose commission of the alleged offences, falling within the parameters for quashing under Section 482 CrPC. The FIR, charge-sheet, and consequent Sessions Trial pr The bench comprised Justices Nandesh S. Deshpande and Urmila Joshi-Phalke. The judgment was delivered by Justice Nandesh S. Deshpande. Counsel appearing: A. G. Mate (counsel for respondent), R. S. Kurekar (counsel for applicant), Ragini Swami (counsel for respondent).

Summary

The applicants sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act, arising from allegations by the complainant related to a political canvassing relationship during municipal elections in Washim. The Court found the case was manifestly attended with mala fide and the allegations did not disclose commission of the alleged offences, falling within the parameters for quashing under Section 482 CrPC. The FIR, charge-sheet, and consequent Sessions Trial proceedings were quashed.

What was the outcome of Mah. State Handlooms Corporation Ltd. ... vs Dy. Regional Director, Employees...?

The applicants sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Section 67 of the IT Act, arising from allegations by the complainant related to a political canvassing relationship ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-22744570)