Mulla Khalil Usmansab vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-21422976 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (3)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Komal Balaji Awatirak Petitioner Mulla Khalil Usmansab Petitioner

Case Significance

Mulla Khalil Usmansab vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-21422976). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (education volunteers) teachers challenged a Government Resolution dated 27 March 2024 that created an appellate committee/forum for teacher service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR created a quasi-judicial tribunal without legislative backing, which was impermissible. The Court held the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum but was within the executive powers of the State, that the teachers had alternate remedy available under the G The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (education volunteers) teachers challenged a Government Resolution dated 27 March 2024 that created an appellate committee/forum for teacher service disputes. The petitioners argued the GR created a quasi-judicial tribunal without legislative backing, which was impermissible. The Court held the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum but was within the executive powers of the State, that the teachers had alternate remedy available under the GR, and dismissed all petitions while granting 4 weeks to approach the appellate committee without limitation bar.

What was the outcome of Mulla Khalil Usmansab vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-21422976)