Vinod Mahabiprasad Gupta vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors

ik-199045999 Bombay High Court 12 November 2024 • 86 min read

Judges (1)

Sandeep V. Marne Delivered

Counsel (10)

Ankur Shah Counsel Respondent Anosh Sequiera Counsel Respondent Bupesh Dhumatkar Counsel Applicant Chetan Kapadia Counsel Applicant Farzana Rine Counsel Applicant G.S. Godbole Counsel Applicant Gautam Ankhad Counsel Respondent Hufeza Nasikwal Counsel Applicant Snehal Raju Modi Counsel Applicant Yuvraj Singh Counsel Applicant

Parties (9)

Dahlia Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Garden View Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Applicant MBK Enterprises Applicant Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Marve Beach Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Mid-Day Publications Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. Respondent Shubh Mangal Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Applicant Vinod Mahabirprasad Gupta Applicant

Case Significance

Vinod Mahabiprasad Gupta vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 12, 2024 (citation: ik-199045999). Two connected civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench, based on grounds of unlawful subletting and unauthorized additions/alterations to the tenanted premises. The key issues were whether Clause 4(c) of the lease deed was violated and whether the findings of unauthorized construction were perverse. The Court dismissed both revision applications, finding the concurrent decrees were based on possible findings su The case was heard by Justice Sandeep V. Marne.

Summary

Two connected civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench, based on grounds of unlawful subletting and unauthorized additions/alterations to the tenanted premises. The key issues were whether Clause 4(c) of the lease deed was violated and whether the findings of unauthorized construction were perverse. The Court dismissed both revision applications, finding the concurrent decrees were based on possible findings supported by evidence and warranted no interference in revisionary jurisdiction, granting a 4-week interim extension.

What was the outcome of Vinod Mahabiprasad Gupta vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors?

Two connected civil revision applications challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appellate Bench, based on grounds of unlawful subletting and unauthorized addi...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-199045999)