Ranjitsing Bhagatsing Patil And Anr vs State Of Mah
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Ranjitsing Bhagatsing Patil And Anr vs State Of Mah is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 16, 2025 (citation: ik-198069233). The appellant husband challenged his conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC for cruelty and abetment of suicide of his wife. The Court found that the prosecution evidence was based on vague, general, and omnibus allegations of cruelty with material omissions and improvements, and failed to establish a direct nexus between the alleged acts and the death. The appeal was allowed, the conviction was quashed, and the appellant was acquitted; the appeal against co-accused father (Appellant The case was heard by Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar. Counsel appearing: Dushyant S. Bhapkar (counsel for intervener), Prakash B. Patil (counsel for appellant), V. M. Lomte (counsel for respondent).
Summary
The appellant husband challenged his conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC for cruelty and abetment of suicide of his wife. The Court found that the prosecution evidence was based on vague, general, and omnibus allegations of cruelty with material omissions and improvements, and failed to establish a direct nexus between the alleged acts and the death. The appeal was allowed, the conviction was quashed, and the appellant was acquitted; the appeal against co-accused father (Appellant No. 2) had already abated due to his death.
What was the outcome of Ranjitsing Bhagatsing Patil And Anr vs State Of Mah?
The appellant husband challenged his conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC for cruelty and abetment of suicide of his wife. The Court found that the prosecution evidence was based on vague, g...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-198069233)