Rosariya Thomas vs Aplab Ltd

ik-193629884 Bombay High Court 7 March 2026 • WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2888 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2879 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2878 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2889 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2881 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2887 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2884 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 2885 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4113 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4947 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4114 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4925 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4944 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5062 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4116 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4941 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 4926 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5072 OF 2025; WRIT PETITION NO. 5052 OF 2025 • 25 min read

Judges (1)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

Rosariya Thomas vs Aplab Ltd is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 7, 2026 (citation: ik-193629884). Twenty retired employees of Aplab Ltd. filed connected writ petitions challenging gratuity computation, arguing that the company calculated gratuity based on 15 days instead of 26 days as applicable to certain categories, and that special allowance should be treated as dearness allowance for purposes of Section 2(s) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. The Court affirmed the Controlling Authority's and Appellate Authority's findings on most issues but remitted the matter for fresh consideration on The case was heard by Justice Amit Borkar.

Summary

Twenty retired employees of Aplab Ltd. filed connected writ petitions challenging gratuity computation, arguing that the company calculated gratuity based on 15 days instead of 26 days as applicable to certain categories, and that special allowance should be treated as dearness allowance for purposes of Section 2(s) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. The Court affirmed the Controlling Authority's and Appellate Authority's findings on most issues but remitted the matter for fresh consideration on whether photocopied salary documents establish entitlement to 26-day gratuity and whether special allowance is in substance dearness allowance. The Appellate Authority was directed to decide the remanded points within eight weeks.

What was the outcome of Rosariya Thomas vs Aplab Ltd?

Twenty retired employees of Aplab Ltd. filed connected writ petitions challenging gratuity computation, arguing that the company calculated gratuity based on 15 days instead of 26 days as applicable t...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-193629884)