Shekhar Kaduba More And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...
Counsel (1)
Case Significance
Shekhar Kaduba More And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-191246217). ITI instructors holding engineering degrees challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that held they were ineligible for appointment as they did not possess the specific ITI trade qualification prescribed in the 1983 Recruitment Rules. The Court found that a degree in engineering was a higher qualification but was not expressly included in the recruitment rules as an equivalent qualification. The writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's view that the petitioners were n The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Prafulla S. Khubalkar. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil. Counsel appearing: G. R. Raghuwanshi (counsel for respondent).
Summary
ITI instructors holding engineering degrees challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that held they were ineligible for appointment as they did not possess the specific ITI trade qualification prescribed in the 1983 Recruitment Rules. The Court found that a degree in engineering was a higher qualification but was not expressly included in the recruitment rules as an equivalent qualification. The writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's view that the petitioners were not entitled to appointment without the prescribed trade qualification.
What was the outcome of Shekhar Kaduba More And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?
ITI instructors holding engineering degrees challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal order that held they were ineligible for appointment as they did not possess the specific ITI trade qualificati...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-191246217)