M/S Ram Swaroop And Sons vs Shri Riyazuddin And Anr

ik-189848924 Delhi High Court 20 December 2025 • 13 min read

Judges (1)

Chandrasekharan Sudha Delivered

Counsel (5)

Anubhav Gupta Counsel Respondent Awadhesh Kumar Counsel Petitioner Ishita Gupta Counsel Respondent Satish Kumar Tripathi Counsel Respondent Urvi Mohan Counsel Respondent

Parties (5)

Ram Swaroop and Sons Petitioner Dinesh Kumar Respondent Hari Kishan Respondent Naresh Kumar Respondent Riyazuddin Respondent

Case Significance

M/S Ram Swaroop And Sons vs Shri Riyazuddin And Anr is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 20, 2025 (citation: ik-189848924). In five connected writ petitions, a shop owner challenged Labour Court awards directing reinstatement and back wages for workmen whose services were terminated without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that the Labour Court's findings on illegal termination were pure findings of fact, neither perverse nor unsupported by the record, and the existence of the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act remedy did not oust the Labour Court's jurisdiction. All five The case was heard by Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha. Counsel appearing: Anubhav Gupta (counsel for respondent), Awadhesh Kumar (counsel for petitioner), Ishita Gupta (counsel for respondent), Satish Kumar Tripathi (counsel for respondent), Urvi Mohan (counsel for respondent).

Summary

In five connected writ petitions, a shop owner challenged Labour Court awards directing reinstatement and back wages for workmen whose services were terminated without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that the Labour Court's findings on illegal termination were pure findings of fact, neither perverse nor unsupported by the record, and the existence of the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act remedy did not oust the Labour Court's jurisdiction. All five writ petitions were dismissed.

What was the outcome of M/S Ram Swaroop And Sons vs Shri Riyazuddin And Anr?

In five connected writ petitions, a shop owner challenged Labour Court awards directing reinstatement and back wages for workmen whose services were terminated without complying with Section 25-F of t...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-189848924)