Vilas Diliprao Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-18911331 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Vilas Diliprao Jadhav Petitioner

Case Significance

Vilas Diliprao Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-18911331). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (education volunteers) challenged a Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees/forums for their service disputes, arguing it constituted an impermissible quasi-judicial forum created by executive power. The Division Bench held the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal but was within the State's legislative competence, and the petitioners had an alternate remedy of approaching the appellate committee un The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevaks (education volunteers) challenged a Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating appellate committees/forums for their service disputes, arguing it constituted an impermissible quasi-judicial forum created by executive power. The Division Bench held the GR did not create a quasi-judicial forum or tribunal but was within the State's legislative competence, and the petitioners had an alternate remedy of approaching the appellate committee under the GR. All writ petitions were dismissed, with liberty to approach the appellate forum within four weeks.

What was the outcome of Vilas Diliprao Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-18911331)