Indraprastha Gas Limited vs M/S Chintamani Food And Snacks
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Indraprastha Gas Limited vs M/S Chintamani Food And Snacks is a Delhi High Court decision dated November 29, 2024 (citation: ik-188353363). Indraprastha Gas Limited sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes arising from a Gas Supply Agreement for Piped Natural Gas, where the respondent was overcharged due to a pricing update failure by a third-party agency. The respondent objected to the unilateral arbitrator appointment clause in the agreement, which the court found invalid under the Supreme Court's judgment in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification. Mr. Anant Vi The case was heard by Justice Sachin Datta. Counsel appearing: Abhishek Gupta (counsel for petitioner), Adnan Saifi (counsel for respondent), Srishti Sharma (counsel for respondent), Udit K. Thakur (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
Indraprastha Gas Limited sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes arising from a Gas Supply Agreement for Piped Natural Gas, where the respondent was overcharged due to a pricing update failure by a third-party agency. The respondent objected to the unilateral arbitrator appointment clause in the agreement, which the court found invalid under the Supreme Court's judgment in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification. Mr. Anant Vijay Palli, Senior Advocate, was appointed as Sole Arbitrator, with proceedings under the aegis of DIAC.
What was the outcome of Indraprastha Gas Limited vs M/S Chintamani Food And Snacks?
Indraprastha Gas Limited sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes arising from a Gas Supply Agreement for Piped Natural Gas, where the respond...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-188353363)