Syed Ekteja Ahmed Hashmi S. Gulam ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Chief ...

ik-186200501 Bombay High Court 25 November 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 2095 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 2084 OF 2024 • 14 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Prafulla S. Khubalkar Coram

Counsel (7)

A.B. Girase Counsel Respondent A.B. Karim Counsel Petitioner Khan Abdul Hamdeem Counsel Petitioner Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Sk. Tarek Mobin Counsel Respondent Sushant Dixit Counsel Petitioner V.D. Sapkal Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Anees Ismail Shaikh Respondent Mustafa Khan Dilawar Pathan Petitioner Syed Ekteja Ahmed Hashmi Petitioner

Case Significance

Syed Ekteja Ahmed Hashmi S. Gulam ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Chi... is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 25, 2024 (citation: ik-186200501). Two petitioners challenged the appointment of respondent Anees Shaikh as a member of the Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, arguing he was unsuitable and lacked proper qualifications. The Court found the respondent was neither disqualified nor had proven misconduct, had applied pursuant to an advertisement, and was lawfully selected by the State. Both writ petitions were dismissed, holding that the scope of judicial review was limited to examining the decision-making process, not th The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Prafulla S. Khubalkar. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Two petitioners challenged the appointment of respondent Anees Shaikh as a member of the Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, arguing he was unsuitable and lacked proper qualifications. The Court found the respondent was neither disqualified nor had proven misconduct, had applied pursuant to an advertisement, and was lawfully selected by the State. Both writ petitions were dismissed, holding that the scope of judicial review was limited to examining the decision-making process, not the suitability of the appointee.

What was the outcome of Syed Ekteja Ahmed Hashmi S. Gulam ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Chi...?

Two petitioners challenged the appointment of respondent Anees Shaikh as a member of the Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, arguing he was unsuitable and lacked proper qualifications. The Co...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-186200501)