Manbharan Singh Yadav vs Dainichi Consultant Inc. And Anr
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Manbharan Singh Yadav vs Dainichi Consultant Inc. And Anr is a Delhi High Court decision dated November 22, 2025 (citation: ik-18584029). The petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes with Dainichi Consultant Inc., a Japanese company with an Indian office in Noida. The respondent raised jurisdictional objections which the court found to be preliminary matters for the arbitrator to decide. A retired District Judge was appointed as Sole Arbitrator to conduct proceedings under the aegis of DIAC. The case was heard by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav. Counsel appearing: Rajiv Narain (counsel for respondent), S.F. Rezvi (counsel for respondent), Vishwa Aman Kandwal (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
The petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes with Dainichi Consultant Inc., a Japanese company with an Indian office in Noida. The respondent raised jurisdictional objections which the court found to be preliminary matters for the arbitrator to decide. A retired District Judge was appointed as Sole Arbitrator to conduct proceedings under the aegis of DIAC.
What was the outcome of Manbharan Singh Yadav vs Dainichi Consultant Inc. And Anr?
The petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes with Dainichi Consultant Inc., a Japanese company with an I...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-18584029)