Anurag Vijaykumar Goel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
Judges (2)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Anurag Vijaykumar Goel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 19, 2024 (citation: ik-18569276). The petitioner husband sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 read with 34 IPC arising from an FIR filed by his wife at Kalachowki Police Station, Mumbai. The key issue was whether the wife's withdrawal of consent to a mutual divorce under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act amounted to abuse of process justifying quashing. The Court dismissed the petition, finding sufficient material in the FIR to proceed to trial and noting the petitioner had already sough The bench comprised Justices A.S. Gadkari and Neela Gokhale. The judgment was delivered by Justice Neela Gokhale. Counsel appearing: Bhomesh Bellam (counsel for petitioner), Madhavi H. Mhatre (counsel for respondent), Pooja Jalan (counsel for petitioner), Prabhjit Jauhar (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
The petitioner husband sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 read with 34 IPC arising from an FIR filed by his wife at Kalachowki Police Station, Mumbai. The key issue was whether the wife's withdrawal of consent to a mutual divorce under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act amounted to abuse of process justifying quashing. The Court dismissed the petition, finding sufficient material in the FIR to proceed to trial and noting the petitioner had already sought discharge before the trial court.
What was the outcome of Anurag Vijaykumar Goel vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr?
The petitioner husband sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A and 406 read with 34 IPC arising from an FIR filed by his wife at Kalachowki Police Station, Mumbai. The key issue w...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-18569276)