Sheikh Mustaq @ Sameer S/O. Sheikh Habib ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ...

ik-183021322 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

G.A. Sanap Delivered

Counsel (1)

Atharva Manohar Counsel Appellant

Parties (16)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Ashwind Singh @ Sonu Shatrughnasingh Chavan Appellant Mangal @ Satyaprakash Nandlal Yadav Appellant Mobin Ahmad Khan Saifulla Khan Appellant Mohd. Sadiq Sheikh Mehaboob Appellant Mohd. Shamim Abdul Ajij Appellant Pankaj Vinayak Kanoje Appellant Prashant Rambali Waghmare Appellant Ravi @ Chhotu Tikaram Bagade Appellant Ravindra @ Ravi Sampatrao Madekar Appellant Rehaan Baig Akram Baig Appellant Sadhna Kishor Itale Appellant Sallukumar @ Selvakumar Balsubramanyam Kaunder Appellant Sheikh Altaf Sheikh Munaf Appellant Sheikh Mustaq @ Sameer Sheikh Habib Appellant Suleman Yunus Surya Appellant

Case Significance

Sheikh Mustaq @ Sameer S/O. Sheikh Habib ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr.... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-183021322). Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused convicted of robbery, criminal conspiracy, wrongful confinement, and receiving stolen property in Sessions Case No.211/2013 at Nagpur. The court acquitted several accused of Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) and acquitted Mohd. Shamim of offences under Sections 397, 120-B and 342 IPC, while upholding other convictions. The partial acquittals were based on insufficient evidence linking individual accused t The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Atharva Manohar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused convicted of robbery, criminal conspiracy, wrongful confinement, and receiving stolen property in Sessions Case No.211/2013 at Nagpur. The court acquitted several accused of Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) and acquitted Mohd. Shamim of offences under Sections 397, 120-B and 342 IPC, while upholding other convictions. The partial acquittals were based on insufficient evidence linking individual accused to specific offences.

What was the outcome of Sheikh Mustaq @ Sameer S/O. Sheikh Habib ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr....?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-183021322)