Praktan Pradeep Taiwade And 2 Others vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gadge Nagpur ...

ik-182357687 Bombay High Court 9 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) No. 738 OF 2022 • 10 min read

Judges (2)

Counsel (4)

Parties (5)

Case Significance

Praktan Pradeep Taiwade And 2 Others vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gadge Nagpu... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 9, 2024 (citation: ik-182357687). Three family members (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A and 323 r/w 34 IPC (matrimonial cruelty) registered at Amravati. The court partly allowed the application — quashing the FIR and chargesheet against applicants 2 and 3 (the parents-in-law) as the allegations of cruelty against them were vague and general, but dismissing the application against applicant 1 (the husband) as allegations against him were specific and constituted a prima The bench comprised Justices Abhay J. Mantri and Avinash G. Gharote. The judgment was delivered by Justice Abhay J. Mantri. Counsel appearing: M.K. Pathan (counsel for respondent), P.V. Navlani (counsel for applicant), S.K. Jain (counsel for respondent), S.S. Dhengale (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Three family members (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A and 323 r/w 34 IPC (matrimonial cruelty) registered at Amravati. The court partly allowed the application — quashing the FIR and chargesheet against applicants 2 and 3 (the parents-in-law) as the allegations of cruelty against them were vague and general, but dismissing the application against applicant 1 (the husband) as allegations against him were specific and constituted a prima facie case.

What was the outcome of Praktan Pradeep Taiwade And 2 Others vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gadge Nagpu...?

Three family members (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A and 323 r/w 34 IPC (matrimonial cruelty) registered at Amravati. The court partly allowe...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-182357687)