Prashant S/O. Rambali Waghmare And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karanja ...

ik-174890636 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

G.A. Sanap Delivered

Counsel (1)

Atharva Manohar Counsel Appellant

Parties (6)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Ashwind Singh Shatrughnasingh Chavan Appellant Pankaj Vinayak Kanoje Appellant Prashant Rambali Waghmare Appellant Ravindra Sampatrao Madekar Appellant Sallukumar Balsubramanyam Kaunder Appellant

Case Significance

Prashant S/O. Rambali Waghmare And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karan... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-174890636). Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused persons convicted in a robbery case at Karanja (Ghadge), District Wardha. The Nagpur Bench partially allowed the appeals, acquitting several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) while modifying convictions for others. Accused No.23 (Mohd. Shamim) was acquitted of all charges under Sections 397, 120-B, and 342 IPC. The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Atharva Manohar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused persons convicted in a robbery case at Karanja (Ghadge), District Wardha. The Nagpur Bench partially allowed the appeals, acquitting several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) while modifying convictions for others. Accused No.23 (Mohd. Shamim) was acquitted of all charges under Sections 397, 120-B, and 342 IPC.

What was the outcome of Prashant S/O. Rambali Waghmare And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karan...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-174890636)