Raoji Harmalkar And Anr vs Sunanda Kashinath Harmalkar

ik-173413403 Bombay High Court 6 March 2026 • WRIT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2025 • 10 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (3)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Raoji Harmalkar And Anr vs Sunanda Kashinath Harmalkar is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 6, 2026 (citation: ik-173413403). The petitioners (son and daughter-in-law of the respondent) challenged an order dismissing their application for condonation of 323 days delay in filing an appeal against an interim maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found no merit in the petition, holding that the Sessions Judge had properly considered all grounds and assigned reasons for dismissing the delay condonation, and the petitioners had not established perversity on the face o The case was heard by Justice Amit S. Jamsandekar. Counsel appearing: J. Sawaikar (counsel for respondent), L. Raghunandan (counsel for petitioner), P. Sawaikar (counsel for respondent).

Summary

The petitioners (son and daughter-in-law of the respondent) challenged an order dismissing their application for condonation of 323 days delay in filing an appeal against an interim maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found no merit in the petition, holding that the Sessions Judge had properly considered all grounds and assigned reasons for dismissing the delay condonation, and the petitioners had not established perversity on the face of the record. The petition was dismissed at the Goa Bench.

What was the outcome of Raoji Harmalkar And Anr vs Sunanda Kashinath Harmalkar?

The petitioners (son and daughter-in-law of the respondent) challenged an order dismissing their application for condonation of 323 days delay in filing an appeal against an interim maintenance order ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-173413403)