Ravindra @ Ravi S/O. Sampatrao Madekar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. ...

ik-167651468 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (1)

Parties (6)

Case Significance

Ravindra @ Ravi S/O. Sampatrao Madekar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-167651468). Fourteen connected criminal appeals by multiple accused challenging convictions for robbery (Sections 397, 120-B, 342, 412 IPC) arising from cases at Karanja (Ghadge) Police Station, Wardha. The Court acquitted several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC and acquitted one accused (Mohd. Shamim) of all charges under Sections 397, 120-B and 342 IPC, cancelling their bail bonds. Appointed advocate's fee directed to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur. The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Atharva Manohar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Fourteen connected criminal appeals by multiple accused challenging convictions for robbery (Sections 397, 120-B, 342, 412 IPC) arising from cases at Karanja (Ghadge) Police Station, Wardha. The Court acquitted several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC and acquitted one accused (Mohd. Shamim) of all charges under Sections 397, 120-B and 342 IPC, cancelling their bail bonds. Appointed advocate's fee directed to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur.

What was the outcome of Ravindra @ Ravi S/O. Sampatrao Madekar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P...?

Fourteen connected criminal appeals by multiple accused challenging convictions for robbery (Sections 397, 120-B, 342, 412 IPC) arising from cases at Karanja (Ghadge) Police Station, Wardha. The Court...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-167651468)