Chandrashekhar Subhrahmanyam ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karanja ...

ik-164941732 Bombay High Court 20 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2017; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 428; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 430; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 436; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 450; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 472; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 473; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 478; CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 • 72 min read

Judges (1)

G.A. Sanap Delivered

Counsel (1)

Atharva Manohar Counsel Appellant

Parties (5)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Ashwind Singh Shatrughnasingh Chavan Appellant Pankaj Vinayak Kanoje Appellant Ravindra Sampatrao Madekar Appellant Sallukumar Balsubramanyam Kaunder Appellant

Case Significance

Chandrashekhar Subhrahmanyam ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karanja ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 20, 2024 (citation: ik-164941732). Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused persons convicted of robbery-related offences at Karanja (Ghadge), Wardha district. The court acquitted several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) as well as other charges including Sections 397, 120-B, and 342 IPC. The bail bonds of the acquitted persons were cancelled and the appointed advocate's fee was directed to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagp The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Atharva Manohar (counsel for appellant).

Summary

Fourteen connected criminal appeals were filed by multiple accused persons convicted of robbery-related offences at Karanja (Ghadge), Wardha district. The court acquitted several accused of the offence under Section 412 IPC (dishonestly receiving stolen property) as well as other charges including Sections 397, 120-B, and 342 IPC. The bail bonds of the acquitted persons were cancelled and the appointed advocate's fee was directed to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur.

What was the outcome of Chandrashekhar Subhrahmanyam ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Karanja ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-164941732)