Dr Sanjay Kaushal vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr

ik-152021698 Delhi High Court 3 December 2025 • 21 min read

Judges (1)

Neena Bansal Krishna Delivered

Counsel (6)

Amol Sinha Counsel Respondent Kshitiz Garg Counsel Respondent Nitish Dhawan Counsel Respondent Prashant Drolia Counsel Petitioner Shashi Shanker Counsel Respondent Suhail Sehgal Counsel Petitioner

Parties (3)

State (NCT) of Delhi Respondent Dr. Sanjay Kaushal Petitioner Jetha Nand Saluja Respondent

Case Significance

Dr Sanjay Kaushal vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 3, 2025 (citation: ik-152021698). The petitioner, a doctor charged under Sections 420/468/467/471/120B IPC for cheating and forgery in connection with a property fraud, challenged the Revisional Court's order upholding the summoning order and issuing notice to the complainant. The petitioner contended that the notice to the complainant amounted to his impleadment as a party, but the court found the notice was merely for the complainant's assistance to the Additional Public Prosecutor. The writ petition was dismissed, finding The case was heard by Justice Neena Bansal Krishna. Counsel appearing: Amol Sinha (counsel for respondent), Kshitiz Garg (counsel for respondent), Nitish Dhawan (counsel for respondent), Prashant Drolia (counsel for petitioner), Shashi Shanker (counsel for respondent), Suhail Sehgal (counsel for petitioner).

Summary

The petitioner, a doctor charged under Sections 420/468/467/471/120B IPC for cheating and forgery in connection with a property fraud, challenged the Revisional Court's order upholding the summoning order and issuing notice to the complainant. The petitioner contended that the notice to the complainant amounted to his impleadment as a party, but the court found the notice was merely for the complainant's assistance to the Additional Public Prosecutor. The writ petition was dismissed, finding no infirmity in the Revisional Court's orders.

What was the outcome of Dr Sanjay Kaushal vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr?

The petitioner, a doctor charged under Sections 420/468/467/471/120B IPC for cheating and forgery in connection with a property fraud, challenged the Revisional Court's order upholding the summoning o...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-152021698)