Trammo Dmcc vs Nagarjuna Fertilizers And Chemicals ...

ik-144652047 Bombay High Court 5 March 2026 • 33 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (7)

Ganesh & Co. Firm Pratik Amin Associates Firm Arun Siwach Counsel Petitioner Darius Khambata Counsel Petitioner Omar Ahmad Counsel Petitioner Prateek Seksaria Counsel Respondent Pratik Poojary Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. Respondent Trammo DMCC Petitioner

Case Significance

Trammo Dmcc vs Nagarjuna Fertilizers And Chemicals ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 5, 2026 (citation: ik-144652047). Trammo DMCC sought enforcement of five foreign arbitral awards totaling USD 16,427,310.80 and GBP 606,628.29 against Nagarjuna Fertilizers under Part II of the Arbitration Act. The petition was allowed in full, and the Court rejected a stay request given the prolonged proceedings. The case was heard by Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan. Counsel appearing: Arun Siwach (counsel for petitioner), Darius Khambata (counsel for petitioner), Omar Ahmad (counsel for petitioner), Prateek Seksaria (counsel for respondent), Pratik Poojary (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Trammo DMCC sought enforcement of five foreign arbitral awards totaling USD 16,427,310.80 and GBP 606,628.29 against Nagarjuna Fertilizers under Part II of the Arbitration Act. The petition was allowed in full, and the Court rejected a stay request given the prolonged proceedings.

What was the outcome of Trammo Dmcc vs Nagarjuna Fertilizers And Chemicals ...?

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-144652047)