Vikas Rajput And Anr. vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

ik-144100618 Bombay High Court 16 December 2025 • 32 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Vikas Rajput And Anr. vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 16, 2025 (citation: ik-144100618). Two police officers sought bail in connection with an FIR for robbery, intimidation, and evidence destruction against civilians in Daman. The Court rejected bail, finding the offences grave and serious, noting the officers had deleted mobile phone data to destroy evidence and their conduct undermined public trust in the criminal justice system. The case was heard by Justice Neela Gokhale. Counsel appearing: Ashwin Thool (counsel for respondent), Murtaza Najmi (counsel for applicant), Shambhu Jha (counsel for applicant), Shreyas Uday Lalit (counsel for respondent).

Summary

Two police officers sought bail in connection with an FIR for robbery, intimidation, and evidence destruction against civilians in Daman. The Court rejected bail, finding the offences grave and serious, noting the officers had deleted mobile phone data to destroy evidence and their conduct undermined public trust in the criminal justice system.

What was the outcome of Vikas Rajput And Anr. vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr.?

Two police officers sought bail in connection with an FIR for robbery, intimidation, and evidence destruction against civilians in Daman. The Court rejected bail, finding the offences grave and seriou...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-144100618)