Shri. Rajeshwarsingh Bechansingh ... vs Chandraraj Co-Operative Housing ...

ik-141091348 Bombay High Court 12 November 2024 • 25 min read

Judges (1)

Sharmila U. Deshmukh Delivered

Counsel (7)

Vinod Mistry and Co. Firm Anusha Amin Counsel Appellant Bhavin Gada Counsel Respondent Chintan Shah Counsel Appellant Karl Shroff Counsel Respondent Prithviraj Gole Counsel Appellant Sandesh Patil Counsel Appellant

Parties (5)

Chandraraj Builders Appellant Chandraraj Co-operative Housing Society Limited Respondent Jaiprakash Chandrabali Thakur Appellant Rajeshwarsingh Bechansingh Appellant Vijaysingh Rajeshwarsingh Bechansing Appellant

Case Significance

Shri. Rajeshwarsingh Bechansingh ... vs Chandraraj Co-Operative Housing ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 12, 2024 (citation: ik-141091348). The appellants (builder and partners) appealed against dismissal of their suit challenging the cooperative housing society's demand for deemed conveyance. The Court held that blanket consent without placing the entire layout plan before flat purchasers does not constitute informed consent for additional construction using unconsumed FSI/TDR. The First Appeal was dismissed, with conveyance directed. The case was heard by Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh. Counsel appearing: Anusha Amin (counsel for appellant), Bhavin Gada (counsel for respondent), Chintan Shah (counsel for appellant), Karl Shroff (counsel for respondent), Prithviraj Gole (counsel for appellant), Sandesh Patil (counsel for appellant).

Summary

The appellants (builder and partners) appealed against dismissal of their suit challenging the cooperative housing society's demand for deemed conveyance. The Court held that blanket consent without placing the entire layout plan before flat purchasers does not constitute informed consent for additional construction using unconsumed FSI/TDR. The First Appeal was dismissed, with conveyance directed.

What was the outcome of Shri. Rajeshwarsingh Bechansingh ... vs Chandraraj Co-Operative Housing ...?

The appellants (builder and partners) appealed against dismissal of their suit challenging the cooperative housing society's demand for deemed conveyance. The Court held that blanket consent without p...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-141091348)