Arvind Arjun Chaudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
Arvind Arjun Chaudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others is a Bombay High Court decision dated March 7, 2026 (citation: ik-13977079). The petitioner, an MIDC employee and partner in a proposed IT firm, challenged the allotment of an MIDC plot in IT Park Chikalthana, Aurangabad to respondent No.7 and sought its allotment to himself. The Aurangabad Bench found the petitioner had no locus standi, as office notings do not create rights unless formalized as orders, and dismissed the petition finding no illegality in the allotment to respondent No.7. The bench comprised Justices Kishore C. Sant and Sushil M. Ghodeswar. The judgment was delivered by Justice Kishore C. Sant. Counsel appearing: Ashish Gabhale (counsel for respondent), D.P. Palodkar (counsel for respondent), Kunal Kale (counsel for petitioner), R.P. Gour (counsel for respondent), Rajendra Deshmukh (counsel for petitioner).
Summary
The petitioner, an MIDC employee and partner in a proposed IT firm, challenged the allotment of an MIDC plot in IT Park Chikalthana, Aurangabad to respondent No.7 and sought its allotment to himself. The Aurangabad Bench found the petitioner had no locus standi, as office notings do not create rights unless formalized as orders, and dismissed the petition finding no illegality in the allotment to respondent No.7.
What was the outcome of Arvind Arjun Chaudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others?
The petitioner, an MIDC employee and partner in a proposed IT firm, challenged the allotment of an MIDC plot in IT Park Chikalthana, Aurangabad to respondent No.7 and sought its allotment to himself. ...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-13977079)