Raju @ Javed Hamidmiya Deshmukh And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ik-136804950 Bombay High Court 5 December 2024 • CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1613 OF 2023 • 8 min read

Judges (2)

Rohit W. Joshi Delivered Vibha V. Kankanwadi Coram

Counsel (4)

A. M. Gaikwad Counsel Respondent G. A. Kulkarni Counsel Respondent Syed Parvez Syed Gani Counsel Applicant U. B. Bilolikar Counsel Applicant

Parties (5)

State of Maharashtra Respondent Bibi Sadiya Respondent Hamidmiya Shah Mohd. Deshmukh Applicant Jamma Begum Himidmiya Deshmukh Applicant Raju @ Javed Hamidmiya Deshmukh Applicant

Case Significance

Raju @ Javed Hamidmiya Deshmukh And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another is a Bombay High Court decision dated December 5, 2024 (citation: ik-136804950). Eight family members of the husband sought quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC by the wife (Bibi Sadiya) at Sillod City Police Station. The Court partly allowed the application, quashing the FIR against applicants 2-8 (the in-laws and relatives) finding the allegations against them were vague, omnibus, and non-specific, while the application of applicant No. 1 (the husband Raju) was dismissed as withdrawn. The bench comprised Justices Rohit W. Joshi and Vibha V. Kankanwadi. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rohit W. Joshi. Counsel appearing: A. M. Gaikwad (counsel for respondent), G. A. Kulkarni (counsel for respondent), Syed Parvez Syed Gani (counsel for applicant), U. B. Bilolikar (counsel for applicant).

Summary

Eight family members of the husband sought quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC by the wife (Bibi Sadiya) at Sillod City Police Station. The Court partly allowed the application, quashing the FIR against applicants 2-8 (the in-laws and relatives) finding the allegations against them were vague, omnibus, and non-specific, while the application of applicant No. 1 (the husband Raju) was dismissed as withdrawn.

What was the outcome of Raju @ Javed Hamidmiya Deshmukh And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another?

Eight family members of the husband sought quashing of an FIR registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC by the wife (Bibi Sadiya) at Sillod City Police Station. The Court...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-136804950)