Sikandar Somsing Chavhan vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps ...
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Case Significance
Sikandar Somsing Chavhan vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated November 26, 2024 (citation: ik-131886061). The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5(k), and 6 of the POCSO Act with a 10-year sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangrulpir (Washim district). The Court found the prosecution's evidence, particularly the victim's testimony, was insufficient to prove the appellant's complicity, and the appellant deserved the benefit of doubt. The appeal was allowed and the appellant was acquitted of all charges. The case was heard by Justice G.A. Sanap. Counsel appearing: Ganesh Umale (counsel for respondent), Neerja G. Choubey (counsel for respondent), S. D. Chande (counsel for appellant).
Summary
The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5(k), and 6 of the POCSO Act with a 10-year sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangrulpir (Washim district). The Court found the prosecution's evidence, particularly the victim's testimony, was insufficient to prove the appellant's complicity, and the appellant deserved the benefit of doubt. The appeal was allowed and the appellant was acquitted of all charges.
What was the outcome of Sikandar Somsing Chavhan vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso Ps ...?
The appellant challenged his conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5(k), and 6 of the POCSO Act with a 10-year sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangrulpir (Washim...
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.
Read on Indian KanoonSource: Indian Kanoon (ik-131886061)