Dr. Sunil Singhal vs Kaluram Rastogi & Anr

ik-129746606 Delhi High Court 6 December 2025 • 6 min read

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Dr. Sunil Singhal vs Kaluram Rastogi & Anr is a Delhi High Court decision dated December 6, 2025 (citation: ik-129746606). The tenant challenged an eviction order passed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act for bona fide requirement of shop premises in Krishna Nagar, Delhi. The Court found no infirmity in the Rent Controller's order and upheld the eviction, rejecting the tenant's argument that the eviction petition was not maintainable due to the landlord's General Power of Attorney being executed after filing. The tenant was directed to vacate the premises as the statutory six-month period had al The case was heard by Justice Saurabh Banerjee. Counsel appearing: A.K. Singla (counsel for petitioner), Anjali Pandey (counsel for respondent), D.K. Rustagi (counsel for respondent), Mayank Rustogi (counsel for respondent), Sahil Kumar (counsel for petitioner), Sayantani Basak (counsel for petitioner).

Summary

The tenant challenged an eviction order passed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act for bona fide requirement of shop premises in Krishna Nagar, Delhi. The Court found no infirmity in the Rent Controller's order and upheld the eviction, rejecting the tenant's argument that the eviction petition was not maintainable due to the landlord's General Power of Attorney being executed after filing. The tenant was directed to vacate the premises as the statutory six-month period had already expired.

What was the outcome of Dr. Sunil Singhal vs Kaluram Rastogi & Anr?

The tenant challenged an eviction order passed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act for bona fide requirement of shop premises in Krishna Nagar, Delhi. The Court found no infirmity in ...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-129746606)