Hasmi Syed Wasiq Ahmad Syed Ahmad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...

ik-128405942 Bombay High Court 25 October 2024 • WRIT PETITION NO. 7355 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6729 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6737 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 6738 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 7977 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10913 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10938 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10956 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10291 OF 2024; WRIT PETITION NO. 10817 OF 2024 • 31 min read

Judges (2)

Mangesh S. Patil Delivered Shailesh P. Brahme Coram

Counsel (7)

Amarjitsing B. Girase Counsel Respondent I. D. Maniyar Counsel Respondent R. S. Wani Counsel Respondent S. B. Ghute Counsel Respondent Sachin S. Deshmukh Counsel Petitioner Saie S. Joshi Counsel Respondent V. S. Panpatte Counsel Petitioner

Parties (6)

Deputy Director of Education, Latur Division Respondent Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded Respondent Gurudev Shikshan Sanstha, Mukhed Respondent State of Maharashtra Respondent Komal Awatirak Petitioner Pooja Wadje Petitioner

Case Significance

Hasmi Syed Wasiq Ahmad Syed Ahmad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... is a Bombay High Court decision dated October 25, 2024 (citation: ik-128405942). Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching) employees challenged the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating an appellate committee for service disputes. The Court held the GR was within the State's legislative competence, did not create an impermissible quasi-judicial forum or tribunal, and was valid and enforceable. All petitions were dismissed and the petitioners were directed to approach the appellate committee within four weeks, with their appeals to be entertain The bench comprised Justices Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme. The judgment was delivered by Justice Mangesh S. Patil.

Summary

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching) employees challenged the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating an appellate committee for service disputes. The Court held the GR was within the State's legislative competence, did not create an impermissible quasi-judicial forum or tribunal, and was valid and enforceable. All petitions were dismissed and the petitioners were directed to approach the appellate committee within four weeks, with their appeals to be entertained on merits without limitation bar.

What was the outcome of Hasmi Syed Wasiq Ahmad Syed Ahmad vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...?

Eleven connected writ petitions by Shikshan Sevak (teaching) employees challenged the Government Resolution dated 27.03.2024 creating an appellate committee for service disputes. The Court held the GR...

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official India Courts portal.

Read on Indian Kanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (ik-128405942)